Stop subsidising unprofitable claims

For law firms

Tariff claims lose money and tie up fee earners for months. Clear them in days instead: paid sooner, clients happier, litigators freed for the cases that need them.

Book a 30-minute call

“We need to litigate to get insurers to move.”

A binding outcome in days is more leverage than a hearing in 40+ weeks. It also frees your litigators for cases that genuinely need court.

“Our clients expect us to fight.”

Clients want resolution and their lives back, not process. Resolving in days rather than months means fewer complaints and better reviews.

“This is just another step in a loss-making process.”

It replaces litigation rather than adding to it. If a claim does proceed to court, your documented engagement strengthens your costs position.

“Tariff claims are just a volume game.”

Volume with better economics: handling hours down ~45%, cash tied up cut ~85%, and a paralegal-friendly process with no Mazur exposure.

~55%

profit improvement on OIC and fast track portfolio work.

~85%

less cash tied up. Paid in days, not after litigation.

~45%

fewer handling hours per claim.

Dispute to decision: days, against 40+ weeks to a hearing. End to end: ~4 months, against ~18–30 months through court.

Partner / head of PI

A tariff book that pays for itself

Fee earners freed from low-value litigation
Cashflow in days, not months
No Mazur risk: paralegals can support arbitration

Fee earner

Cases that move without chasing

Defined response windows on every offer
No court queues, no adjournments
Clients get answers, not updates

See whether your strategy is working: across your book, opponent by opponent, and down to where your teams can improve. All of it built from what each side has already disclosed on the claim.

Opponent analysis

Your recovery rate against each insurer you face, per claim category: where outcomes against one opponent run below the rest of your book, and the positions driving it.

Cash and lock-up

Referral-to-outcome times and what they do to work in progress, so you can see when cash actually arrives, category by category.

Valuation calibration

How your opening positions compare with final outcomes, so pricing the next claim starts from evidence.

Fee earner insight

Response times and engagement patterns at fee earner level: where cases wait, on whom, and where handling can improve.

Delivered as periodic MI reports. Everything in them comes from your own claims as disclosed; platform-wide benchmarks are aggregated and anonymised.

Exactly the type of market-led initiative regulators have been calling for.

Reported resolution through ADR for disputes that can take almost 300 days in litigation.